Psychometric science · Built for Africa

Employers aren't short of applicants. They're short of signal.

Aptrova measures personality, motivation and aptitude — then matches people to the roles they'll actually thrive in. Normed for Africa, engineered for how work really gets done here.

Mobile-first · Under 5MB · Resumes on a dropped 3G connection
Sample profileOperations Manager
86
Strong fit
Diligence88
Composure83
Curiosity62
Collaboration71
Energy54
A single bad mid-level hire in Lagos costs millions of naira — in recruitment spend, lost productivity, and re-hiring.
CVs are unverified, easily embellished, and structurally incapable of predicting whether a person will perform or stay. Aptrova gives a scientifically grounded fit signal before the first interview — and hands every candidate a professional report they own.
The science

Open science. Original instruments. No licensing shortcuts.

Every scientific component is public-domain or built in-house. Three assessment modules, each anchored in a framework with decades of cross-cultural evidence — then adapted for the African context rather than imported wholesale.

01 · Personality

Five Factor Model

The most replicated framework in organisational psychology. Items drawn from the public-domain IPIP pool and reviewed for African linguistic context — never from any commercial instrument.

CuriosityDiligenceEnergyCollaborationComposure
02 · Motivation

Self-Determination Theory

What actually drives engagement and retention — autonomy, mastery, relatedness and more. Original, in-house items written from the theory's constructs, not copied from any published scale.

AutonomyMasteryRelatednessPurpose
03 · Cognitive aptitude

Adaptive reasoning

Verbal, numerical and abstract reasoning delivered adaptively with Item Response Theory — written for contextual neutrality, and roughly 30% shorter without losing precision.

VerbalNumericalAbstractIRT-adaptive
Deterministic scoring
Scores are auditable, in-house logic — not AI. Defensible for fairness and diligence.
Human in the loop
No auto-reject, no pass/fail gate. Every score is decision support for a person.
NDPA by design
Consent, data rights and a DPIA built into the product from the first line of code.
Fairness auditing
Adverse-impact analysis treated as a validity requirement, monitored continuously.
Built for Africa

Global platforms were normed for someone else.

Scored against a European norm group, a Nigerian manager gets percentiles that misrepresent her standing. Priced for European budgets and built desktop-first, those tools exclude most of the market. Aptrova is engineered against all three failures.

The African norm database

Building the first commercially deployed African professional norm base — the strategic asset no later entrant can shortcut. Every assessment makes matching more accurate.

→ Compounding advantage

Offline-resilient by default

Progress saves locally and syncs when connectivity returns. The whole assessment fits in a data budget under 5MB, on a mid-range Android phone.

→ 25–35 min · Android-first

Compliance as architecture

No fields for ethnicity, religion, or health status — they don't exist in the product. Anti-discrimination safeguards and consent are designed in, not bolted on.

→ NDPA 2023 aligned
How it works

From application flood to ranked shortlist.

Step 01

Candidate assesses

A 25–35 minute assessment on any Android phone — personality, motivation and aptitude — that resumes cleanly if the connection drops.

Step 02

Scored against the role

A deterministic, auditable engine scores each candidate against the specific role's archetype — minimum and optimal bands per dimension, weighted.

Step 03

Shortlist & owned report

The employer gets a ranked shortlist with plain-language insight. Every candidate keeps a professional report — an asset, not just a hurdle.

Founding expert panel · Phase 1

The item bank review is open.

Our founding panel of senior HR practitioners is now reviewing every assessment item for relevance, clarity and fairness in African workplaces. Every score is documented — the review itself is part of the science.

  • Score each item, 1–4Relevance to its construct in our market, and one-read clarity on a mid-range phone.
  • Flag anything unfairOne tap flags an item that could advantage or disadvantage any group — flagged items go to panel discussion, never quietly through.
  • Review at your own paceYour answers save on your device as you go; export and send your scores back when you finish.

Panellist access

You'll need the name and reviewer slot we assigned to you. Your scores stay on your device until you export them.

Open the review portal

Confidential — for confirmed founding panellists only. Questions? hello@aptrova.com

Aptrova ← Back to site
Phase 1 · Content validity review · Confidential

Expert review portal

Thank you for lending your judgement to Aptrova's founding item bank. Your scores decide which items proceed to build — this is the layer imported tests have never had.

What you are reviewing.

Each card shows one draft assessment item, the module it belongs to (PERSONA = personality · DRIVE = motivation · APTITUDE = cognitive ability), and the specific construct it is meant to measure — with a plain-language definition of that construct shown directly under the tags. Judge every item against its own construct definition, not against your general impression.

How to score each item.
  • Relevance (1–4): how well does this item measure its stated construct for professionals in Nigerian and African workplaces? 1 = does not measure it · 2 = weakly, needs major revision · 3 = measures it, minor revision possible · 4 = clearly measures it as written.
  • Clarity (1–4): would a candidate reading on a mid-range phone understand it correctly in one read? 1 = confusing or ambiguous · 2 = hard to follow · 3 = clear with minor polish possible · 4 = crystal clear.
  • Bias flag: tick if the item could advantage or disadvantage any group — by region, gender, class, language background, schooling or work context. Flagged items go to panel discussion; nothing is retired on one flag alone.
  • A written comment is required for any score of 1–2 or any bias flag — tell us what to change and why.
How your scores are used.

Five reviewers score every item independently. An item passes when at least four of five reviewers rate it 3+ on both relevance and clarity with no bias flags; items short of that are revised or retired, and any bias flag sends the item to panel discussion. Your answers save on this device as you go — review in as many sittings as you like — and when you finish, tap Submit my scores.

Confidential — not for distribution. Item content © Aptrova, 2026. · Portal build v2.1
0 of 0 items scored